Resources
Learning about evaluationARC is dedicated to helping programs meet their evaluation needs. Below are some links and resources we hope you will find informative and useful. If you have other questions, please feel free to contact us and we will be glad to help. |
|
|
Questions to answer before beginning an evaluation1. What is program evaluation?Broadly, there are two types to consider. Process evaluations help programs assess whether their services are being provided as intended. Outcome evaluations focus more on assessing outcomes--the benefits youth are deriving. Most of our evaluations are outcome evaluations that include aspects of process evaluation that help us understand how outcomes were achieved. 2. Why do an evaluation?Evaluation should be integral to your program's efforts to fulfill its mission. Youth programming is most likely to be effective when it is informed by current research reflecting best practices and potential outcomes. Even programming designed with careful attention to best practices is not guaranteed to be successful at implementing them. Program evaluation shows how well programming is adhering to its goals, demonstrates positive outcomes, and highlights areas for improvement. And, effective evaluation helps programs compete for funds. 3. How much evaluation do you need?Unless fulfilling an evaluation requirement or seeking to attract government or foundation funding, programs benefit most from program evaluation done at regular intervals to ensure that services are as effective as they should be. Between full evaluations, programs should monitor the processes previous evaluation showed to be effective to ensure strengths are maintained and flaws improved. 4. Why work with an external evaluator?Whether you decide to work with ARC or not, it is in your program's best interests to conduct an external evaluation--to at least make sure an objective expert designs and oversees it. Having your program evaluated by someone with inadequate education or experience places you at risk for serious practical and ethical problems, including: failing to identify and demonstrate positive outcomes; basing programmatic decisions on inaccurate findings; and, eroding grantor confidence by presenting untenable findings. Hiring an external evaluator can be expensive, but the costs of not doing so can be prohibitive. Program Evaluation Links
Resources for Mentoring Programs
|